Anthony Gucciardi
Prisonplanet.com
Wednesday, February 28, 2012
Amid the controversy surrounding the potential release of heavily weaponized H5N1 bird flu, scientists are now reporting that they have found evidence of flu in bats, and state that the risk to humans is unclear. Being labeled as ‘bat flu’, the discovery marks the first documented report of a flu virus in winged mammals. For now, scientists have not been able to grow the virus and are unaware of how easily the virus can spread.
The news shocked many scientists who previously thought that the flu had already been discovered in all possible animals. While flu bugs have been tracked in animals such as dogs, horses, whales, and seals, bats were never thought to contract the flu. Interestingly, however, it may have been discovered around five years ago. Back in 2009, Russian virologists reported that they had found flu in bats, but their claims were ejected due to insufficient evidence.
“Most people are fairly convinced we had already discovered flu in all the possible” animals, said Centers for Disease Control and Prevention scientist Ruben Donis, who co-wrote the bat flu study.
The news could not have come at a better time for some scientists who continue to push for a release of the mutated H5N1 bird flu strain, which was mutated 5 times in order to become highly contagious between ferrets – the very animal model used to study human flu infection. Taking attention away from the bird flu release controversy, bat flu may soon become the new focus in the field of potentially threatening viruses. For now, the WHO says that the weaponized strain will not be released until a panel of ‘experts’ determines it to be safe. Paul Keim, chair of the National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity, explained how volatile of a weapon the mutated bird flu could become:
“This is such a dangerous biological weapon, it would not be controllable. Whoever used it would doubtlessly decimate their own people as well,” Keim said.
Scientists say that bat flu could potentially pose a risk to humans if it were to mingle with more common forms of influenza, swap genes, and mutate into something more dangerous. If you’re worried about the flu, natural solutions do exist. Vitamin D can slash your risk of the flu by nearly half, and is more effective than harmful medical interventions.
This article first appeared at Natural Society
7 Responses to “‘Bat Flu’ Scare Hits Media Among Weaponized Bird Flu Release Debate”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
OK, I’ll say it……Holy batshit!, Batman.
jeffydiver Reply:
February 29th, 2012 at 6:47 am
You took the air out of my balloon ! The return of Batman, this time we’ll make him a villain instead of a fighter against the new world order !
white nose is killing millions of bats in usa at least so it may not be a usa problem…however theres lots of em in asia where disease vectors seem to run rampant.
still transmission may not be easy if it hasnt been found before.
Damnit, now I have to get rid of my pet bat!! Does this give the term “she/he is downright batty, or they have bats in the belfree” a whole new meaning or what?
Same flu as in the movie Contagion, started with the bats and spread to pigs, and was eaten by the humans. Let’s stir up some more scare tactics to make people want some crazy, deadly – not gonna cure the ailment, type vaccine.
I am just so gonna wander around worried about what flu I might get next!! NOT!
We already had bird-flu which disapeared like magic, so they named this one bat-flu.
the nwo seem to repeat things they must have a very short term memory …
another propaganda for histerical paranoia being fed…….next the tiny little ant will have a nuclear bomb tied to it’s waste with the nano tech……………………….
Vic Reply:
February 29th, 2012 at 12:32 pm
now prepare sheeple, prepare they are about to offer vaccines to deal with the bat flue